

This is a collaborative blog. Our aim is to share knowledge and experience to help all of us on a lifelong journey of learning - a journey we all pray will lead us & our families to goodness in this life, and in the Hereafter.



1. Learning Basic Trust Versus Basic Mistrust (Hope)
Chronologically, this is the period of infancy through the first one or two years of life. The child, well - handled, nurtured, and loved, develops trust and security and a basic optimism. Badly handled, he becomes insecure and mistrustful.
practical suggestions: hold babies close, respond to crying babies right away
2. Learning Autonomy Versus Shame (Will)
The second psychosocial crisis, Erikson believes, occurs during early childhood, probably between about 18 months or 2 years and 3½ to 4 years of age. The "well - parented" child emerges from this stage sure of himself, elated with his new found control, and proud rather than ashamed. Autonomy is not, however, entirely synonymous with assured self - possession, initiative, and independence but, at least for children in the early part of this psychosocial crisis, includes stormy self - will, tantrums, stubbornness, and negativism. For example, one sees may 2 year olds resolutely folding their arms to prevent their mothers from holding their hands as they cross the street. Also, the sound of "NO" rings through the house or the grocery store.
suggestions to foster independence by: giving children simple choices, don't give false choices, set clear, consistent, reasonable limits, accept children's swings between independence and dependence and reassure them that both are okay.
3. Learning Initiative Versus Guilt (Purpose)
Erikson believes that this third psychosocial crisis occurs during what he calls the "play age," or the later preschool years (from about 3½ to, in the United States culture, entry into formal school). During it, the healthily developing child learns:
(1) to imagine, to broaden his skills through active play of all sorts, including fantasy
(2) to cooperate with others
(3) to lead as well as to follow.
Immobilized by guilt, he is: (1) fearful (2) hangs on the fringes of groups (3) continues to depend unduly on adults and (4) is restricted both in the development of play skills and in imagination.
Suggestions to support children's development of initiative in the third stage, educators can: encourage children to be as independent as possible,
focus on gains as children practice new skills, not on the mistakes they make along the way
set expectations that are in line with children's individual abilities
focus curriculum on real things and on doing
4. Industry Versus Inferiority (Competence)
Erikson believes that the fourth psychosocial crisis is handled, for better or worse, during what he calls the "school age," presumably up to and possibly including some of junior high school. Here the child learns to master the more formal skills of life:
(1) relating with peers according to rules
(2) progressing from free play to play that may be elaborately structured by rules and may demand formal teamwork, such as baseball,
and
(3) mastering social studies, reading, arithmetic. Homework is a necessity, and the need for self-discipline increases yearly. The child who, because of his successive and successful resolutions of earlier psychosocial crisis, is trusting, autonomous, and full of initiative will learn easily enough to be industrious. However, the mistrusting child will doubt the future. The shame - and guilt-filled child will experience defeat and inferiority.
5. Learning Identity Versus Identity Diffusion (Fidelity)
During the fifth psychosocial crisis (adolescence, from about 13 or 14 to about 20) the child, now an adolescent, learns how to answer satisfactorily and happily the question of "Who am I?" But even the best - adjusted of adolescents experiences some role identity diffusion: most boys and probably most girls experiment with minor delinquency; rebellion flourishes; self - doubts flood the youngster, and so on.
Erikson believes that during successful early adolescence, mature time perspective is developed; the young person acquires self-certainty as opposed to self-consciousness and self-doubt. He comes to experiment with different - usually constructive - roles rather than adopting a "negative identity" (such as delinquency). He actually anticipates achievement, and achieves, rather than being "paralyzed" by feelings of inferiority or by an inadequate time perspective. In later adolescence, clear sexual identity - manhood or womanhood - is established. The adolescent seeks leadership (someone to inspire him), and gradually develops a set of ideals (socially congruent and desirable, in the case of the successful adolescent). Erikson believes that, in our culture, adolescence affords a "psychosocial moratorium," particularly for middle - and upper-class American children. They do not yet have to "play for keeps," but can experiment, trying various roles, and thus hopefully find the one most suitable for them.
6. Learning Intimacy Versus Isolation (Love)
The successful young adult, for the first time, can experience true intimacy - the sort of intimacy that makes possible good marriage or a genuine and enduring friendship.
7. Learning Generativity Versus Self-Absorption (Care)
In adulthood, the psychosocial crisis demands generativity, both in the sense of marriage and parenthood, and in the sense of working productively and creatively.
8. Integrity Versus Despair (Wisdom)
If the other seven psychosocial crisis have been successfully resolved, the mature adult develops the peak of adjustment; integrity. He trusts, he is independent and dares the new. He works hard, has found a well - defined role in life, and has developed a self-concept with which he is happy. He can be intimate without strain, guilt, regret, or lack of realism; and he is proud of what he creates - his children, his work, or his hobbies. If one or more of the earlier psychosocial crises have not been resolved, he may view himself and his life with disgust and despair.
These eight stages of man, or the psychosocial crises, are plausible and insightful descriptions of how personality develops but at present they are descriptions only. We possess at best rudimentary and tentative knowledge of just what sort of environment will result, for example, in traits of trust versus distrust, or clear personal identity versus diffusion. Helping the child through the various stages and the positive learning that should accompany them is a complex and difficult task, as any worried parent or teacher knows. Search for the best ways of accomplishing this task accounts for much of the research in the field of child development.
Socialization, then is a learning - teaching process that, when successful, results in the human organism's moving from its infant state of helpless but total egocentricity to its ideal adult state of sensible conformity coupled with independent creativity.
* originally appeared at http://www.childdevelopmentinfo.com/development/erickson.shtml
Suggestions from "Theories of Childhood", by Carol Garhart Mooney

Westheimer, who holds the university research chair in democracy and education at the University of Ottawa, will speak tonight at Lisgar Collegiate Institute on “testing, accountability and the threat to Canadian democracy.”
While North American schools talk about good citizenship, they have done little to kindle critical thinking, he says.
“The kinds of goals and practices commonly represented in curricula that hope to foster democratic citizenship usually have more to do with voluntarism, charity and obedience than with democracy. In other words, ‘good citizenship’ to many educators means listening to authority figures, dressing neatly, being nice to neighbours, and helping out at a soup kitchen — not grappling with the kinds of social policy decisions that every citizen in a democratic society needs to learn how to do,” he wrote in No Child Left Thinking.
Sure, it’s important to feed hungry people and act morally and ethically, says Westheimer, who taught grades 6, 7 and 8 — what he calls a “crazy and amazing age” — in New York City during the ’80s. But the next step is the harder one: find the source of a problem in society and think of ways to solve it.
A community food drive illustrates the three types of “good” citizen. The “personally responsible” citizen will contribute if asked. The “participatory citizen” will organize the drive. The third type, the “justice-oriented” citizen doesn’t see charity and volunteerism as ends in themselves and instead asks why people are hungry. That type of citizen is rarely nurtured in the schools, he says.
(For the record, yes, Joel Westheimer is the son of that other Westheimer, sex therapist Dr. Ruth. “It’s less interesting than you might think. She wasn’t Dr. Ruth when I was growing up,” he says.)
After Westheimer left the classroom in New York, he headed for Stanford University. He taught at New York University, and has lived in Ottawa for the past seven years.
In the past two decades, civics have become more formally woven into the curriculum along with increased standardized testing.
It’s not necessarily a good thing, says Westheimer. The focus on literacy and numeracy have forced other kinds of learning to take a back seat.
“We can test math and reading skills, but it’s harder to test critical thinking,” he says. “We end up caring about what we can measure instead of measuring what we care about.”
In Ontario, civics is now a mandatory course in Grade 10. Westheimer believes it actually turns students off civic engagement because it’s dull.
“Kids really want to get involved. But they’re involved in such superfluous ways, they get disengaged.”
Two years ago, Ontario also mandated “character education” for all schools in the province. In an editorial for Orbit, the magazine of the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, the writers noted that research in the U.S. has demonstrated character education has a positive effect on student discipline and achievement. Teachers are also happier because student behaviour and the tone of the school is improved.
Maybe character education improves discipline, but so does beheading, jokes Westheimer. Critical thinkers are not easy to teach. “Everyone likes to teach critical thinking, but no one wants to teach a class of critical thinkers.”
He argues that the time and resources spent on character education would be better spent in creating a stimulating curriculum. When students are engaged, then discipline problems are reduced.
“They’ll cause trouble for the right reasons,” he says. “Some forms of trouble are the engine of democratic society.”


"How could two sensitive and intelligent men
of very similar backgrounds differ so markedly concerning a book which
everyone knows is a wold classic? The answer is complicated, but it can
be made simple: Pickthall read Arabic and Carlyle did not."